I'm surprised myself, but it works. Worth checking out as a really cheap way to be more effective if you have good reactions and bad aim. You could work out a formula for optimum fighting distance based on aim and reaction speed, but I suspect the useful element would boil down to "if you have bad aim, take available opportunities to trade with better players".

I noticed that I can beat much better scouts in MGE by running straight into them and out-reacting them. Test your reaction time here: http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime and look at the results in this thread http://etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-28560/page-7/ - if you're faster than average you can take closer fights.

Yeah, I said to keep doing it until it gets predictable.

It's a good idea if you have better reactions but worse aim.

Lol, no.

I noticed that I can beat much better scouts in MGE by running straight into them and out-reacting them. Test your reaction time here: http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime and look at the results in this thread http://etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-28560/page-7/ - if you're faster than average you can take closer fights.

Wait a minute... You want to get better, you know that practice is the only way, and yet you come here asking for help. Am i missing something here?

I feel like dm is good to learn movement patterns but for warmup I like tr_walkway and doing the thing where you track bots as they go on the launchpad. Watch some demos see where scouts position themselves and what they do in certain situations but most of all just play scrims.