<?xml version="1.0" ?><rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
	<title>ETF2L &#8211; Latest activity in &#8220;Overclocking AMD athlon 7550&#8221;</title>
	<link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/support/topic-17103/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[The latest posts to this topic.]]></description>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Animal</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/support/topic-17103/page-3/?recent=310520#post=310520</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from Cloud</i>
		<blockquote>If you bought a mobo which doesn't let you alter the NB speed, for a chipset with an NB, and you planned on overclocking it, you need to do more research quite frankly...
</blockquote>yeah turns out if u dont have L3 u dont have NB freq]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=support&#038;topic=17103&#038;post=310520</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:47:15 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Cloud</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/support/topic-17103/page-3/?recent=310520#post=310472</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[If you bought a mobo which doesn't let you alter the NB speed, for a chipset with an NB, and you planned on overclocking it, you need to do more research quite frankly...

Anyway, anyone feel like helping the OP out? I don't have an AMD rig anywhere to go look at to help, nor can I be arsed to get googling ))]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=support&#038;topic=17103&#038;post=310472</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:39:35 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Animal</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/support/topic-17103/page-3/?recent=310520#post=310449</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from octochris</i>
		<blockquote>[...]

northbridge frequency. it's important when overclocking. you are one of the people i meant when i said "people who are shit at overclocking and think it's all about fsb and multi" i guess! :p</blockquote>well, i can do voltage adjusts aswell but if ur mobo supports things like individual bridge speed adjustements ill take the blame of beeing stupid n00b who doesnt spend hundreds of quid on sick mobos and cooling solutions to gain maybe few hundreds of mhz

good topic now that we got rid of shrew btw, keep on going, maybe ill learn something new :]]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=support&#038;topic=17103&#038;post=310449</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 23:21:54 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Mr Mugabe</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/support/topic-17103/page-3/?recent=310520#post=310420</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from Le meme arrows</i>
		<blockquote>[...]I have same CPU and just got a question. Any idea why I can't get my NB frequency above 2400 even with 1.4 voltage?</blockquote>

Your ram speed is probably 2 high because you increased your NB freq. What kind of speed is your ram build for ?]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=support&#038;topic=17103&#038;post=310420</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:07:31 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Spike Himself</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/support/topic-17103/page-3/?recent=310520#post=310418</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[^ or he's overheating]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=support&#038;topic=17103&#038;post=310418</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:59:48 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Mr Mugabe</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/support/topic-17103/page-3/?recent=310520#post=310417</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from AnimaL</i>
		<blockquote>whats a NB freq :X</blockquote>

I see what you did there :)]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=support&#038;topic=17103&#038;post=310417</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:59:29 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Dr. Chris</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/support/topic-17103/page-3/?recent=310520#post=310414</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from AnimaL</i>
		<blockquote>whats a NB freq :X</blockquote>

northbridge frequency. it's important when overclocking. you are one of the people i meant when i said "people who are shit at overclocking and think it's all about fsb and multi" i guess! :p

<i>Quoted from Le meme arrows</i>
		<blockquote>[...]I have same CPU and just got a question. Any idea why I can't get my NB frequency above 2400 even with 1.4 voltage?</blockquote>

all boards, chips and dies are different, sometimes to huge degrees. you probably just hit the point that putting in more voltage isn't going to make any difference.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=support&#038;topic=17103&#038;post=310414</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:41:23 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Animal</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/support/topic-17103/page-3/?recent=310520#post=310408</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[whats a NB freq :X]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=support&#038;topic=17103&#038;post=310408</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:58:14 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by krap92</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/support/topic-17103/page-3/?recent=310520#post=310405</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from octochris</i>
		<blockquote>those benchmarks test WHO IS BETTER AT RUNNING THE BENCHMARK. its the same as when people say to use glxgears as some sort of benchmark, it tests HOW WELL GLXGEARS RUNS, not anything else. so let's not suddenly jump to conclusions that it somehow is indicative of a better cpu.

and xeon is such a common home processor, oh yes...

i have my phenom ii 945 x4 running at 4.3GHz. people who think amd's are difficult to overclock are, in reality, just shit at overclocking and think it's all about fsb and cpu clock multi.</blockquote>I have same CPU and just got a question. Any idea why I can't get my NB frequency above 2400 even with 1.4 voltage?]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=support&#038;topic=17103&#038;post=310405</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:50:47 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Koeitje</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/support/topic-17103/page-3/?recent=310520#post=310400</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[If you get one of the newer i5's, make sure you get the K version and the right chipset on the mobo else you wont be able to oc it.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=support&#038;topic=17103&#038;post=310400</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:30:50 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Septique</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/support/topic-17103/page-2/?recent=310520#post=310394</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[Tbh I would pick sandy bridges over 1366  everyday and situation. They are just better in every way. Don't know if you actually need the 2600 one. 2500 is cheaper and can reach the same performance after oc.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=support&#038;topic=17103&#038;post=310394</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:54:21 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Cloud</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/support/topic-17103/page-2/?recent=310520#post=310391</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from Pyle</i>
		<blockquote>EDIT: that leaves the price... 2600 setup seems to be cheaper, so pick 2600.</blockquote>

This, plus you (I think) actually have an upgrade path on the same socket in the future]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=support&#038;topic=17103&#038;post=310391</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:35:46 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Mr Mugabe</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/support/topic-17103/page-2/?recent=310520#post=310365</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[Well thats a tough one... ^^ 

They are both equally expensive, OC'd they are both more or less equally fast.. i7 930 uses more power then the 2600.. Ehh.. getting a headache.. IDK, pick one I would say srry :&#124;

EDIT: that leaves the price... 2600 setup seems to be cheaper, so pick 2600.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=support&#038;topic=17103&#038;post=310365</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:05:13 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Spike Himself</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/support/topic-17103/page-2/?recent=310520#post=310363</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[Thanks, that's very helpful! :)
But what of the cpu? :D
ie 2600 vs 930


<i>Quoted from Pyle</i>
		<blockquote>This socket is targeted towards the mainstream PC users.</blockquote>
<i>Quoted from Pyle</i>
		<blockquote>However, the hexacore options for the Socket 1366 will overtake this socket any day when performing most tasks.</blockquote>

This seems a bit silly considering the price of hexacores :D]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=support&#038;topic=17103&#038;post=310363</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:52:17 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Mr Mugabe</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/support/topic-17103/page-2/?recent=310520#post=310360</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from Spike Himself</i>
		<blockquote>How well does the i7 oc on 1155 (2600(K?)) as opposed to 1366 (930 D)? Considering going for a new setup for my already-way-too-expensive WC project and I shall not be satisfied with a clock below 4.2ghz.</blockquote>

Pros of the Socket 1155:
 Best price to performance ratio
 Integrated graphics option (H Series Chipset)
 Most efficient use of cores
 New socket that will last for a while
 Supports modern video cards and technologies (and will for some time)
 
Cons of the Socket 1155:
 Motherboards are steadily increasing in price ever since the recall
 Low Motherboard availability
 Overwhelming amount of Chipset Options
 No hexacore options
 Less PCIe capabilities than the x58 (socket 1366)
 Dual Channel Memory

Pros of Socket 1366:
 Fastest Available Socket to date
 Only Hexacore (6 core) platform
 Supports more lanes of PCIe bandwidth / PCIe cards
 Tri-Channel Memory
 
Cons of Socket 1366:
 Will be phased out at the end of the year
 Expensive price tag that makes this purchase a lot harder to justify with the advent of 1155

Socket 1366 versus 1155
 
Intel recently released their new Sandybridge Processors earlier this year. This socket was 1155. These new processors actually store the video card controller in the CPU and give extreme performance/over clock abilities. The new motherboards for this socket have just rolled out, as their was a recall on them several weeks ago.
 
This socket is targeted towards the mainstream PC users. You will find that it can play games, and will even perform well in rendering, video editing, etc. The performance gap between this socket and 1366 decreases exponentially if you are able to buy a K series 1155 socket processor and overclock it. This socket is the most powerful in terms of efficiency per core. However, the hexacore options for the Socket 1366 will overtake this socket any day when performing most tasks.

SOURCE: http://geekmontage.com/texts/intel-socket-1155-vs-1156-vs-1366-x58-vs-2011/
Conclusion: Socket 1155 ( with unlocked multipl. ) rock @ oc.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=support&#038;topic=17103&#038;post=310360</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:49:15 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    </channel>
</rss>