Forum
Quakenet - you thought the etf2l admins were bad?
Created 27th December 2009 @ 22:42
Well, I suppose some of you may remember a topic I made about 3 weeks ago regarding giving out BNC’s. Anyway, the last thing posted was saying I needed to get trust status from Quakenet. So I then spent 4 days sorting out all the BS technical requirements they ask for to get one, after which I send another request.
2 days later, now having taken up 7 days of my time, the admins are polite enough to send a 1 sentance reply, “we don’t give trust status to ‘free bnc’s.”. Now to their credit, I can see what they were thinking when they put this, so slightly annoyed, I tried to speak to someone in #help and the reply from one particularly nice admin after explaining the situation was simply to re-submit the request with a full explanation, which I did.
That was submitted on the 12th of December.
After a week or so, I went to ask in #help again what was going on as it shouldn’t in my opinion take a week for something this simple to go through. The reply I got was pretty much “zomg, just be patient ffs”. After being rather annoyed about this, I decided there was nothing I could do and just decided to wait.
Today, the 27th of December, more than 2 weeks later, I have the following email land in my inbox:
Ticket ID: 40880
Ticket Type: trust
Request Date: Dec 12th 2009, 22:11 GMT
Status: Rejected
Reason:
channel too small for any trusts
The channel in question is #skyridebncs
Someone tell me thats not a bullshit reason? Everyone who has asked me for a BNC (~30 people) has been there at some point and there are about 10 idlers there. But either way, what the fuck does that actually mean?
I was just wanting to be nice, offer something to people for free and here comes some Quakenet admin on a fucking power trip who decides thats not good enough.
Well, you make up your minds…
Cheers,
Adam
Also, forgot to say. I went into #help about 30mins ago, asking if I could speak to someone, the reply I got was simply “all decision on trust requests are final non-debate-able”.
I do not even have to tell you that you are a tool, since you already know that you are.
This must be a new low, however. I happen to know a bunch of quakenet-ops very well and sorted the trusts for Deltrons box for the ETF2L-bots without any hassle and within two days. Why? Because I’m not a retarded smurf like you are. I even took the liberty to ask one of them about your case.
Now, you might wonder where you went wrong and I did right — and I shall be good enough to tell you!
You do nothing but spam these forums and anyone else with utter nonsense at the first chance you get. NOBODY in their RIGHT MIND would trust you with ANYTHING, simply due to the WAY YOU ARE PORTRAYING YOURSELF.
Quakenet have had a bunch of problems with people spamming and doing retarded shit, some clown who can’t even show proper manners when dealing with the people who has VERY LIMITED FREE TIME and MANAGE QUAKENET FOR FREE, makes it as no surprise the ruling your trust comes off as denied. Giving out stupid bouncers to random people on the intertubes is _NOT NICE_ as you seem to think, it’s a disaster waiting to happen — especially in your incapable hands.
Applying this formula, since you take this MORONIC shit and turn it into bashing ETF2L is even worse, but why am I not surprised…
Both organizations can and should gag you for being a whining donkey dork.
That would be justice.
some clown who can’t even show proper manners when dealing with the people who has VERY LIMITED FREE TIME and MANAGE QUAKENET FOR FREE
ho ho ho, Lets stop right there shall we.
Ive actually at no point raged or insulted any quakenet admin until now. Infact I was as polite as possible as I am fully aware they do this in their free time.
…and turn it into bashing ETF2L is even worse…
1) That was simply a joke, I am NOT bashing etf2l
2) The level on hypocrisy in that statment cannot even be conveyed in words
When you spend 3 weeks working on something and some person who has absolutely no idea what you are doing declines it for some bullshit reason, you have something of a right to be annoyed. You of all people should know that.
Last edited by Skyride,
Gryzor, you appear to have taken that personally.
I dont think he was ranting about anyone in particular.
This must be a new low, however.
It really is.
mike shut up
*THIS JUST IN*Today a swedish man took the internet too seriously and shouted at a 15 year old scottish boy.
The result?
An erect penis
Last edited by Tapley ❤,
Gryzor rebuttal.
inb4 airshot…also mike can you stfu?Seriously man stop being an attention fucking whore
Last edited by alfa,
*THIS JUST IN*Today a swedish man took the internet too seriously and shouted at a 15 year old scottish boy.
The result?
An erect penis
This made me laugh ^^
*THIS JUST IN*Today a swedish man took the internet too seriously and shouted at a 15 year old scottish boy.
The result?
An erect penis
This guy is just lovely <3
Holy shit I think Gryzor for once right in his drunken ramblings.
content rss