<?xml version="1.0" ?><rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
	<title>ETF2L &#8211; Latest activity in &#8220;Contradiction in AFS rules&#8221;</title>
	<link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/league/topic-10601/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[The latest posts to this topic.]]></description>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by DeNeusbeer</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/league/topic-10601/page-1/?recent=190382#post=190382</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[It sometimes baffles me how people find seemingly unrelated topics to dump their question in. Anyway:

<i>Quoted from dauk</i>
		<blockquote>http://etf2l.org/matches/19189/

why did they got 4-1 isntead of 5-1?</blockquote>
They got 5-1.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=league&#038;topic=10601&#038;post=190382</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 00:42:25 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Dauk</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/league/topic-10601/page-1/?recent=190382#post=190365</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[http://etf2l.org/matches/19189/

why did they got 4-1 isntead of 5-1?]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=league&#038;topic=10601&#038;post=190365</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 00:12:01 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Gozzer</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/league/topic-10601/page-1/?recent=190382#post=190012</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[Didn't think it was worth creating a thread as Its only minor and I expect admins are already on the case:

The map pool states "cp_gullywash" to be in the map pool and Arnold has released "cp_gullywash_imp3". Gullywash wont be played til the 6th week but I guess the sooner we know anything the better :)]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=league&#038;topic=10601&#038;post=190012</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:06:29 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Tikcus</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/league/topic-10601/page-1/?recent=190382#post=189743</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[does not matter :p

apart from the last sentence from rule 2.8 needs to be changed or re-written

I assume you are going to do that anyway


		<blockquote> in a division with eight or less teams left, you can miss only one match.</blockquote>]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=league&#038;topic=10601&#038;post=189743</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:21:23 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by SnowiE</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/league/topic-10601/page-1/?recent=190382#post=189715</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[Yeah it's a mistake, we'll get it fixed.
<i>Quoted from Tikcus</i>
		<blockquote>[...]

the % rule should be removed anyway, it should be set to a fixed amount regardless of how many other teams fold in your division.

As it stands your team may get removed from the league if you default 1 match, and 4 other teams drop (and 4 teams dropping from 1 division in the summer, not that unlikely)</blockquote>
No they're two seperate rules. If you default lose 3 games then you're automatically dropped. The percentage rule only decides whether a dropped teams' results will still count or not.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=league&#038;topic=10601&#038;post=189715</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:37:51 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by caned</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/league/topic-10601/page-1/?recent=190382#post=189701</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[I'm pretty sure they mean if you've played 75% of matches.  Allowing teams to miss over 25% of their matches &#38; still showing their scores would be retarded.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=league&#038;topic=10601&#038;post=189701</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:05:43 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Tikcus</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/league/topic-10601/page-1/?recent=190382#post=189699</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from Sylosin</i>
		<blockquote>In <a href="http://etf2l.org/about/rules/#9">section 2.8</a> of the AFS-specific rules, it says <em>"Dropped teams’ results will be deleted if they play less than 75%"</em>, then immediately after says <em>"if they <strong>miss</strong> more than 75%"</em>.

<em><strong>Playing</strong> less than 75%</em> of matches is <em><strong>missing</strong> more than 25%</em>, not 75%.

Likewise <em><strong>missing</strong> more than 75%</em> of matches is <em><strong>playing</strong> less than 25%</em>, not 75%.

The example the rule gives after the contradiction adheres to the "playing less than 75%", but this could be misinterpreted :&#62;</blockquote>

the % rule should be removed anyway, it should be set to a fixed amount regardless of how many other teams fold in your division.

As it stands your team may get removed from the league if you default 1 match, and 4 other teams drop (and 4 teams dropping from 1 division in the summer, not that unlikely)]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=league&#038;topic=10601&#038;post=189699</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:56:45 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by sylosin</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/league/topic-10601/page-1/?recent=190382#post=189697</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from kuma</i>
		<blockquote>i think if you miss lots of games, they delete your results. not sure though</blockquote>

yeah, that might be what it's trying to say.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=league&#038;topic=10601&#038;post=189697</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:52:54 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by xInuy</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/league/topic-10601/page-1/?recent=190382#post=189696</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from pukz</i>
		<blockquote>[...]

So how many points do you get for disarming the bomb then?</blockquote>

5!!!!!!!!!!!]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=league&#038;topic=10601&#038;post=189696</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:51:07 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by kuma1</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/league/topic-10601/page-1/?recent=190382#post=189695</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[i think if you miss lots of games, they delete your results. not sure though]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=league&#038;topic=10601&#038;post=189695</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:50:37 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by pukz</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/league/topic-10601/page-1/?recent=190382#post=189694</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from Sylosin</i>
		<blockquote>In <a href="http://etf2l.org/about/rules/#9">section 2.8</a> of the AFS-specific rules, it says <em>"Dropped teams’ results will be deleted if they play less than 75%"</em>, then immediately after says <em>"if they <strong>miss</strong> more than 75%"</em>.

<em><strong>Playing</strong> less than 75%</em> of matches is <em><strong>missing</strong> more than 25%</em>, not 75%.

Likewise <em><strong>missing</strong> more than 75%</em> of matches is <em><strong>playing</strong> less than 25%</em>, not 75%.

The example the rule gives after the contradiction adheres to the "playing less than 75%", but this could be misinterpreted :&#62;</blockquote>

So how many points do you get for disarming the bomb then?]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=league&#038;topic=10601&#038;post=189694</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:48:51 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Created by sylosin</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/league/topic-10601/page-1/?recent=190382#post=189691</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[In <a href="http://etf2l.org/about/rules/#9">section 2.8</a> of the AFS-specific rules, it says <em>"Dropped teams’ results will be deleted if they play less than 75%"</em>, then immediately after says <em>"if they <strong>miss</strong> more than 75%"</em>.

<em><strong>Playing</strong> less than 75%</em> of matches is <em><strong>missing</strong> more than 25%</em>, not 75%.

Likewise <em><strong>missing</strong> more than 75%</em> of matches is <em><strong>playing</strong> less than 25%</em>, not 75%.

The example the rule gives after the contradiction adheres to the "playing less than 75%", but this could be misinterpreted :&#62;]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=league&#038;topic=10601&#038;post=189691</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:39:55 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    </channel>
</rss>