<?xml version="1.0" ?><rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
	<title>ETF2L &#8211; Latest activity in &#8220;Mid-spec config&#8221;</title>
	<link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-9615/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[The latest posts to this topic.]]></description>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by shifty</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-9615/page-1/?recent=165616#post=165616</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[Thanks Rake and Chris, i'll have a look.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=general&#038;topic=9615&#038;post=165616</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 19:48:32 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Dr. Chris</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-9615/page-1/?recent=165616#post=165484</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from Rake</i>
		<blockquote>Probably because doing that does fuck all to your fps most of the time?</blockquote>

And you're suggesting that a hypothetical "mid-spec config" would? You have to go one way or the other to put a dent in FPS.

This is my least bad-looking FPS config I have on my site, give it a whirl if you like (although it does remove blood/ragdolls and some other things).

http://christf2.xtreemhost.com/cfg/moreframes.htm

Screenshots are here:

http://christf2.xtreemhost.com/screenshots.htm]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=general&#038;topic=9615&#038;post=165484</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 10:28:59 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Rake</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-9615/page-1/?recent=165616#post=165482</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from octochris</i>
		<blockquote>Er, if you're wanting a mid-level config why not just lower the settings to medium?</blockquote>

Probably because doing that does fuck all to your fps most of the time? I get the exact same fps all low on dx8 as I do with all maxed apart from aa@4x on dx9, and the only way to increase it is with a fps config. I recommend you just take m0res, add a few commands at the end of it to increase the graphics quality and voila, you're done. Some commands would be mat_reducefillrate "0", mat_picmip -1, r_rootlot 0, r_lod 0, r_worldlights 4, mat_bumpmap 1, r_lightaverage 1, mat_antialias 1-8, mat_forceaniso 1-16. That should make it not look terrible. Oh, and that works on both dx8 and 9 without the white shine.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=general&#038;topic=9615&#038;post=165482</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 10:14:22 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Dr. Chris</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-9615/page-1/?recent=165616#post=165475</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from eoN^</i>
		<blockquote>[...]

Byte.</blockquote>

Byte isn't the maker of obscure, I forget who makes obscure but they should work on optimising the map a bit.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=general&#038;topic=9615&#038;post=165475</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 06:53:27 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by eoN</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-9615/page-1/?recent=165616#post=165339</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from Daniel</i>
		<blockquote>Or maybe the maker of Obscure shoulda made the map better. :(</blockquote>

Byte.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=general&#038;topic=9615&#038;post=165339</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 22:36:02 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by danilovic</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-9615/page-1/?recent=165616#post=165337</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[Or maybe the maker of Obscure shoulda made the map better. :(]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=general&#038;topic=9615&#038;post=165337</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 22:20:47 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Dr. Chris</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-9615/page-1/?recent=165616#post=165330</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[Er, if you're wanting a mid-level config why not just lower the settings to medium?]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=general&#038;topic=9615&#038;post=165330</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 21:46:14 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Created by shifty</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-9615/page-1/?recent=165616#post=165325</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[Basically I need a config to lower settings to around middle instead of high for maps such as obscure..

i.e. keeping blood, models on death etc.. although lowering textures and just general settings so theyre not THAT bad... but not good.

Are there any decent ones that are worthy as I really cba to create one myself..

Thanks in advance.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=general&#038;topic=9615&#038;post=165325</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 20:58:58 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    </channel>
</rss>