ETF2L – Latest activity in “Update 21.9.2010” https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-13001/ Reply by metalpiss https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-13001/page-2/?recent=222432#post=222432 generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=general&topic=13001&post=222432 Wed, 22 Sep 2010 01:45:29 +0200 Reply by danilovic https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-13001/page-2/?recent=222432#post=222388 generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=general&topic=13001&post=222388 Tue, 21 Sep 2010 23:18:24 +0200 Reply by sk1pp3r88 https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-13001/page-2/?recent=222432#post=222387 Quoted from Inuy
[...] rofl prehistoric.. mine is 4200+
Well it's at least 3 years old. But you can OC it to 3.1 GHz (same with 4200+) so it's not that bad.]]> generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=general&topic=13001&post=222387 Tue, 21 Sep 2010 23:18:19 +0200 Reply by Tikcus https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-13001/page-2/?recent=222432#post=222370 generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=general&topic=13001&post=222370 Tue, 21 Sep 2010 22:25:18 +0200 Reply by xInuy https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-13001/page-2/?recent=222432#post=222369 Quoted from Scorpion
Huge FPS improvement on my prehistoric Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Brisbane lol)
rofl prehistoric.. mine is 4200+]]> generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=general&topic=13001&post=222369 Tue, 21 Sep 2010 22:23:09 +0200 Reply by sk1pp3r88 https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-13001/page-2/?recent=222432#post=222358 generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=general&topic=13001&post=222358 Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:24:02 +0200 Reply by abdaO.o https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-13001/page-2/?recent=222432#post=222300 generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=general&topic=13001&post=222300 Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:28:06 +0200 Reply by AnAkIn_ https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-13001/page-2/?recent=222432#post=222268 Quoted from Orchid
then which one is it? -1 or 2?
-1]]> generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=general&topic=13001&post=222268 Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:31:56 +0200 Reply by Dr Justice https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-13001/page-2/?recent=222432#post=222267 generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=general&topic=13001&post=222267 Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:31:19 +0200 Reply by kuma1 https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-13001/page-2/?recent=222432#post=222252 Quoted from AnAkkk
[...] As the information I got came from a Valve developer, it's not wrong. -2 is the "old" -1 that you had at the game release (that's why it's legacy), when mat_queue_mode wasn't working (disabled by default, when was set to -1). This means it does the same as 0, there is no multi threading. You should remember forcing it enabled (setting it to 2) would cause crashes. And yes, mat_queue_mode -1 is currently auto detect so it should do the same thing as 2 if you got a multicores cpu.
http://www.astrodispatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/28/92af2_backpedal.jpg]]> generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=general&topic=13001&post=222252 Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:05:32 +0200 Reply by Demophon https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-13001/page-2/?recent=222432#post=222251 generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=general&topic=13001&post=222251 Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:00:58 +0200 Reply by Septique https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-13001/page-2/?recent=222432#post=222237 generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=general&topic=13001&post=222237 Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:42:49 +0200 Reply by adam-skyride https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-13001/page-2/?recent=222432#post=222234 generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=general&topic=13001&post=222234 Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:30:32 +0200 Reply by AnAkIn_ https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-13001/page-2/?recent=222432#post=222232 Quoted from freshmeatt
[...] Wrong. Again. mat_queue_mode -2 - legacy default (i don't have any idea what does 'legacy' mean in that case, but rendering is way different than with 0) mat_queue_mode -1 - default (a.k.a. automatic detection ffs) mat_queue_mode 0 - synchronous single thread (one core) mat_queue_mode 1 - queued single thread (I had higher fps with this one on p4 with hyperthreading) mat_queue_mode 2 - queued multi thread (a.ka. multi core).
As the information I got came from a Valve developer, it's not wrong. -2 is the "old" -1 that you had at the game release (that's why it's legacy), when mat_queue_mode wasn't working (disabled by default, when was set to -1). This means it does the same as 0, there is no multi threading. You should remember forcing it enabled (setting it to 2) would cause crashes. And yes, mat_queue_mode -1 is currently auto detect so it should do the same thing as 2 if you got a multicores cpu.]]> generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=general&topic=13001&post=222232 Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:19:46 +0200 Reply by freshmeatt https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/general/topic-13001/page-2/?recent=222432#post=222211 Quoted from AnAkkk
[...] No, mat_queue_mode 1 does something different. -2 is the default and is the same as 0.
Wrong. Again. mat_queue_mode -2 - legacy default (i don't have any idea what does 'legacy' mean in that case, but rendering is way different than with 0) mat_queue_mode -1 - default (a.k.a. automatic detection ffs) mat_queue_mode 0 - synchronous single thread (one core) mat_queue_mode 1 - queued single thread (I had higher fps with this one on p4 with hyperthreading) mat_queue_mode 2 - queued multi thread (a.ka. multi core).]]> generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=general&topic=13001&post=222211 Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:57:04 +0200