ETF2L – Latest activity in “Steam groups for divisions” https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-7140/ Reply by Kasuno https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-7140/page-2/?recent=110761#post=110761 generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=feedback&topic=7140&post=110761 Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:39:10 +0200 Reply by adam-skyride https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-7140/page-2/?recent=110761#post=110744 div1 use irc cos we're not special :] div1 use IRC because they are mostly old school gamers from before the time of this fancy steam thing. (not that im included in that group but ive been using IRC for longer than ive been gaming).]]> generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=feedback&topic=7140&post=110744 Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:54:12 +0200 Reply by The Pledge https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-7140/page-2/?recent=110761#post=110682 generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=feedback&topic=7140&post=110682 Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:42:40 +0200 Reply by carbon https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-7140/page-2/?recent=110761#post=110671 http://steamcommunity.com/groups/div6 Gotta love Div6 doing what the others don't. :P I was told that at some point div3 had a similar group. The problem was that it fell apart when new season started as no-one cared to purge all the users who had moved to another division. That's why I'm asking for league maintained groups that are cleaned between seasons.]]> generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=feedback&topic=7140&post=110671 Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:10:20 +0200 Reply by SEB https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-7140/page-1/?recent=110761#post=110669 generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=feedback&topic=7140&post=110669 Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:06:53 +0200 Reply by Severyo https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-7140/page-1/?recent=110761#post=110666 generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=feedback&topic=7140&post=110666 Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:01:14 +0200 Reply by Grem https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-7140/page-1/?recent=110761#post=110624 generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=feedback&topic=7140&post=110624 Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:38:53 +0200 Reply by str8outtaCompton https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-7140/page-1/?recent=110761#post=110589
There should be a small penalty for repeatingly leaving matches unscheduled when your opponent has tried to contact you. Cases where both teams are idling should be handled differently than cases where only the other team is showing no interest.
thats what a default date is for, but agreed its annoying Yeah, that system allows a team that has-all-the-time-in-the-world-but-just-don't-care to grief teams that care about scheduling but can't play at any given default time. And it also delays matches. But I guess this has been discussed before, so I won't continue :p]]> generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=feedback&topic=7140&post=110589 Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:58:57 +0200 Reply by -Flush- https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-7140/page-1/?recent=110761#post=110587 There should be a small penalty for repeatingly leaving matches unscheduled when your opponent has tried to contact you. Cases where both teams are idling should be handled differently than cases where only the other team is showing no interest. thats what a default date is for, but agreed its annoying]]> generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=feedback&topic=7140&post=110587 Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:55:25 +0200 Reply by Animal https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-7140/page-1/?recent=110761#post=110586 generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=feedback&topic=7140&post=110586 Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:54:58 +0200 Reply by FADe4 https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-7140/page-1/?recent=110761#post=110585 generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=feedback&topic=7140&post=110585 Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:53:32 +0200 Reply by str8outtaCompton https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-7140/page-1/?recent=110761#post=110584 generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=feedback&topic=7140&post=110584 Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:45:30 +0200 Reply by MajorPimpsa https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-7140/page-1/?recent=110761#post=110580 generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=feedback&topic=7140&post=110580 Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:26:06 +0200 Reply by carbon https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-7140/page-1/?recent=110761#post=110578 I don't really understand how having a steam group would make it any easier. Could you explain please? At the beginning of the season admins create groups for every division and invite all the leaders to join. Now every clan would have a direct channel to speak to their opponents by accepting just one (1) invite - without the hassle of adding anyone manually. Of course this wouldn't help with people not replying but it certainly would make the process more enjoyable. If you have participated in wptf2l you'll know how well their system works.]]> generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=feedback&topic=7140&post=110578 Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:21:28 +0200 Reply by SfnX https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-7140/page-1/?recent=110761#post=110573 generator=rsdiscuss&baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&feed=forum&forum=feedback&topic=7140&post=110573 Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:56:59 +0200