<?xml version="1.0" ?><rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
	<title>ETF2L &#8211; Latest activity in &#8220;Suggestion: Highlander Season 9 all tiers use Swiss System&#8221;</title>
	<link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-32055/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[The latest posts to this topic.]]></description>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by schabdaniel</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-32055/page-2/?recent=543987#post=543987</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[It's more like, I'm providing counterpoints to stuff I disagree with, because I don't think swiss is the solution to our problem. Sure, there's issues with scheduling and I wish sometimes it was more flexible, but introducing a new system won't solve it. I do also agree with you in that wildcards make some games less competitive due to having to find mercs or play with substitutes.
The ways to make it more flexible that I can think of are all outside of ETF2L's control. That would be things like chat groups just for the team leaders, so there's more communication between them. Or, just players in each team not f*cking around and saying "uuuu i don't know my schedule 7 days in advance" -- that's just silly, IMO.
Problems with scheduling, in my personal experience, are always when the scheduling for the next match is ignored for one reason or another until the last moment.
I think this is the root of the problem, not the system being used.
For example, a thing that would be easy to introduce is e-mail/steam reminders to leaders that there is no date set yet for a match, in order to bring more attention to it before a random default is set. I'm aware this is already being done in some cases, but AFAIK it's mostly through match comments, and it isn't being done consistently and/or automated.

On your other point, I believe that differentiating premiership from the other divisions is a good thing because having it be different creates a more "exclusive" feel to it. The team that gets into prem suddenly has the <em>privilege</em> of finding out who all their opponents are, and getting to plan/hype themselves in advance for respective matches. It's like an additional "grats, you made it into prem", so to speak.
From the perspective of outsiders, the fact that all the enemies known beforehand, is positively relevant in the way that they can guess and discuss about the flow of the season. If they don't have that knowledge beforehand, they'll just start guessing and discussing a bit later. This is a bit of a non-factor for prem though, because there's only 8 teams and the hype will be more about <em>who plays</em>, not <em>who plays who when</em>.
In any way, the end result is a write-up one or two days before stating who plays each other and when. This is, IMO, what the majority cares about and the only bit of information about the match they'll get right before watching it.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=feedback&#038;topic=32055&#038;post=543987</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 12:31:21 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by popcorp</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-32055/page-2/?recent=543987#post=543984</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[If it's not broken, don't fix it.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=feedback&#038;topic=32055&#038;post=543984</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 10:22:05 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by b33p_</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-32055/page-2/?recent=543987#post=543982</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from Steve!</i>
		<blockquote>Having a slightly different system serves only to differentiate Prem from the rest, in a good way.</blockquote>

I see your point of view as counterpoints to mine. But the last assertion I'm unsure of. Why is this differentiation doing it in a good way? What is a 'good' way of being different (and not the obvious: the reason they're in a higher tier)?]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=feedback&#038;topic=32055&#038;post=543982</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 07:37:28 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by schabdaniel</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-32055/page-2/?recent=543987#post=543972</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from b33p</i>
		<blockquote>
Two separate pages for the highlander tables is strange, inefficient and counter intuitive. 

The league will be more interesting, there will be something to find out every week other than match results, it'll be more fun.</blockquote>

Opinions.

<i>Quoted from b33p</i>
		<blockquote>Premier teams currently have an advantage over the other tiers in that they see who they play during the whole season.</blockquote>
Prem does not compete with other tiers directly, hence advantages don't matter.

<i>Quoted from b33p</i>
		<blockquote>Thing is, though, Tryhard eSports actually has a tough week 3 week too, and can't plan to focus Week 4 maps during Week 3 the way Epsi can, giving them a disadvantage Epsi doesn't have to deal with.</blockquote>
Have you seen the maps being played? There's almost no variation. Everyone knows their shit. "Breather weeks" are irrelevant in how you compete in the other weeks. TF2 practice is TF2 practice, doesn't matter if it's on pl_badwater, koth_viaduct or cp_process.
<i>Quoted from b33p</i>
		<blockquote>Or, if prem was using the same system as every other tier, teams would always be on their toes</blockquote>
If the team needs a surprise factor as motivation to compete at their best, they don't have a place in prem, IMO.

<i>Quoted from b33p</i>
		<blockquote>Wasn't a key reason Swiss was great was to cut down admins making default times and reading the comments and all that nonsense? If prem used Swiss too you could clearly indicate the best times to play using the system on the site. And yeah, comments can clarify times or preferences (not sure if the ETF2L system has preferences tbh) if that's even necessary.</blockquote>
This is exactly what's being done in Prem at the moment, in the current system.

<i>Quoted from b33p</i>
		<blockquote>In fact, keeping prem on the old system but removing their wildcards is actually a worse system than before Swiss was changed for the other tiers. So scheduling in prem is harder and more important and crucial now, and we're working in this old system. Throw prem a bone!</blockquote>
Scheduling is easy, the only times scheduling fiascoes happen is when one or both of the teams are lazy and/or don't use match comments. Or, when the leader is struggling internally with finding out his team's availability. Which shouldn't be ETF2L's problem.

<i>Quoted from b33p</i>
		<blockquote>
• Will make prem more interesting to spectate week on week
• Should make scheduling easier
• Improves league consistency
</blockquote>
Prem is already plenty interesting, with good games happening each week.
Scheduling is already easy enough, provided you don't alienate yourself from half of your opponents. :)
The league is consistent across the majority of its player base. Premiership is supposed to be exclusive and reserved for the best of players. Having a slightly different system serves only to differentiate Prem from the rest, in a good way.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=feedback&#038;topic=32055&#038;post=543972</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 02:39:23 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Toregant</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-32055/page-1/?recent=543987#post=543971</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[I agree with b33p it ruins the enjoyment of my TF2 knowing, deep down in my heart, that the divisions with 3 times or more the size of prem have a different way to organise their games. 

Of course there would not be rolls in prem, as b33p said it would only devalue the tippy top(py?) of competitive Team Fortress Two in the only format that matters. Never have I witnessed a season of premiership highlander where teams get rolled repeatedly or barely leave a dent in the top two finishers.

As b33p has brought this to my attention I'm honestly wondering if people like kolkata and permzilla even care.

Keep doing gods work b33p i will be there 106.3% supporting you.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=feedback&#038;topic=32055&#038;post=543971</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 02:19:32 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by schabdaniel</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-32055/page-1/?recent=543987#post=543970</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[Don't fix what isn't broken]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=feedback&#038;topic=32055&#038;post=543970</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 02:12:04 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by b33p_</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-32055/page-1/?recent=543987#post=543964</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[I was wondering if you could clarify a few things:

<i>Quoted from kKaltUu</i>
		<blockquote>We've chosen to exclude premiership from the swiss system to alleviate the randomness per matchweek. The teams are playing for a prize pool and prestige, and having some security in the flow of the season showed (in the past) that teams will have an easier time fielding a strong lineup. </blockquote>

I actually don't know what this means. Knowing who you're playing in week 3 causes your team to have a higher chance of fielding a strong team for week 3. What evidence is there of this?


<i>Quoted from kKaltUu</i>
		<blockquote>An added problem on top of that is that swiss doesn't work with 8 teams. </blockquote>

It does work. This sentence is incorrect.


<i>Quoted from kKaltUu</i>
		<blockquote>You need more to provide enough options for the teams to still play other teams within their range.</blockquote>

That's why those 8 are in prem and not scattered throughout the rest of the tiers! This is literally the point in tiers and why there is not having ETF2L as one big Swiss based table!

<i>Quoted from kKaltUu</i>
		<blockquote>With swiss in a small group you'll end up having the steamrolls at the end of the season</blockquote>

<i>Quoted from Lazybear</i>
		<blockquote>Since there are only 8 teams in the group anyways I'd rather admins manually organising top teams to not play vs each other in earliest weeks </blockquote>

<i>Quoted from Selek</i>
		<blockquote>I don't understand how the steamrolls would be more prominent at the end of the season, but I'll take your word for it.</blockquote>

If there are streamrolls, and that's a big if (which devalues prem to an extent), they're going to happen in week 2, 4 or 6, or whenever. Not a good reason, for me, but let's say that would be an issue. Teams are seeded at the start of the season anyway, so this will literally only happen the way you say it will if you seed the teams as such. In other words, what you're arguing against is perfectly avoidable, by you (Kaltu).


<i>Quoted from kKaltUu</i>
		<blockquote>Bottom line is that anything that promotes competitiveness is welcome, as long as it doesn't hinder the teams. </blockquote>

For the record, you haven't shown that it would hinder teams.

<i>Quoted from Admirable</i>
		<blockquote>Why would you crowbar Swiss in to a division that is specifically designed to run for 7 weeks and have each team play each other once.

The Swiss system is a compromise based on the fact that it would take too long for everyone to play everyone in the bigger divisions.

You appear to be mad at the scheduling system, but want to bring in an entirely new (and unnecessary) tournament structure to deal with your gripes.

You are using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.</blockquote>

Admirable I actually liked the old system but the disparity in the league is what I'm talking about here. The removal of wildcards was not ideal either. But anyway, on the point about the design of the league. Remember Season 4? The league was designed so each team played 5 weeks of games because each division had 6 teams. That was the design. 

But then in Season 5, the divisions were increased to 8 teams. Oh no! Actually, they just added another 2 weeks of games. Simple! So the whole design aspect is m00t. Again, I liked the old system even though wildcards did fuck us for a few weeks in the past. League consistency is what I'm talking about. Hardly crowbarring! You should work for the Daily Mail m8.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=feedback&#038;topic=32055&#038;post=543964</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 01:26:38 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Admirable</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-32055/page-1/?recent=543987#post=543938</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[Why would you crowbar Swiss in to a division that is specifically designed to run for 7 weeks and have each team play each other once.

The Swiss system is a compromise based on the fact that it would take too long for everyone to play everyone in the bigger divisions.

You appear to be mad at the scheduling system, but want to bring in an entirely new (and unnecessary) tournament structure to deal with your gripes.

You are using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=feedback&#038;topic=32055&#038;post=543938</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 19:20:38 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by HartzFartz</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-32055/page-1/?recent=543987#post=543937</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[I dont think it would be wise for prem to switch to swiss system because there aren't enough teams in prem.
If we would switch to swiss system in prem we would also need more teams in prem which in my opinion would be unwise as well.

Kepp the current system for prem please.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=feedback&#038;topic=32055&#038;post=543937</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 19:16:58 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Selektionsfaktor</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-32055/page-1/?recent=543987#post=543934</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[I don't understand how the steamrolls would be more prominent at the end of the season, but I'll take your word for it.

But unifying the system for the whole league sounds like a sensible thing to me. Prem isn't a special snowflake, just the prettiest one.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=feedback&#038;topic=32055&#038;post=543934</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 19:08:57 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Scissors-HL</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-32055/page-1/?recent=543987#post=543930</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[Swiss system is aids as fuck pls no was so happy when they announced prem would be without it]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=feedback&#038;topic=32055&#038;post=543930</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 18:47:29 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by kKaltUu</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-32055/page-1/?recent=543987#post=543926</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[We've chosen to exclude premiership from the swiss system to alleviate the randomness per matchweek. The teams are playing for a prize pool and prestige, and having some security in the flow of the season showed (in the past) that teams will have an easier time fielding a strong lineup. 

An added problem on top of that is that swiss doesn't work with 8 teams. You need more to provide enough options for the teams to still play other teams within their range. With swiss in a small group you'll end up having the steamrolls at the end of the season, since the teams that have played each other are closer and the top teams will have to play unmatched teams, who are most likely at the bottom.

If you're talking about adding premiership to the High tier, that's a possibility and will get rid of the grey zone between bottom prem and top high. But it doesn't take away the scheduling problems and exclusivity rules that we've set up for prem in the past few seasons.

Bottom line is that anything that promotes competitiveness is welcome, as long as it doesn't hinder the teams. We've chosen for round robin for premiership since that's the cleanest way to provide a solid road to playoffs. 

If we're going to change formats, I suggest GSL style.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=feedback&#038;topic=32055&#038;post=543926</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 18:08:55 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Mervin</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-32055/page-1/?recent=543987#post=543925</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from Muuki</i>
		<blockquote>would definitely make it easier for you to default hunt</blockquote>

&#60;3]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=feedback&#038;topic=32055&#038;post=543925</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 18:02:09 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by EmilioEstevez</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-32055/page-1/?recent=543987#post=543924</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[Having different (easier/harder) routes to the playoffs is going to be shitty for teams in the 2nd-6th area. It's already an issue in lower divs, would be even shittier in Prem.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=feedback&#038;topic=32055&#038;post=543924</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:31:01 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by lazybear</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/feedback/topic-32055/page-1/?recent=543987#post=543922</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from Muuki</i>
		<blockquote>would definitely make it easier for you to default hunt</blockquote>

[x] told 
[  ] not told

I think the Swiss system is overall better but at least in high an issue is that everyone plays different opponents and some have easier paths than others (arguably). For prem I think it's critical that every team plays vs all teams in the group. I would find it demotivating to play the same opponents twice during regular season. Since there are only 8 teams in the group anyways I'd rather admins manually organising top teams to not play vs each other in earliest weeks maybe but after regular season everyone will meet in the playoffs anyways]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=feedback&#038;topic=32055&#038;post=543922</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:28:53 +0200</pubDate>
    	</item>
    </channel>
</rss>