i'll simplify this 1. read the rules before signing your team up for the season 2. follow the rules 3. enjoy your season

Yes that's is true and apparently it was used in the past, but does someone remember being in enforced in highlander, also like I wrote the older version was different than current one.

So let's have look at rule itself what is very few of the lineup are still active and participating? The rule is being enforced by judging if the players who started when seasons begun. But it also checks if players actually play, but it's really hard to judge because players added to roster can be as well just subs, and just bad luck and it ends having 5 non regular players and 4 which started the season.

Also I want to bring that really what extrem lineup changes mean, because from my pespective dropping one player and getting one instead once a week, or even twice is hardly extreme for highlander. Players dropping left and right, quiting, getting bored.

The rule itself force people now to do math and by removing those teams it will cause just panic with some leaders. I really think the rule should be just removed for rest of season

and rules should be different for highlander and for 6v6 and be straigh forward with numbers or percentage.

So you ignored all my questions which was about general issues + how it could be exploited. As i was merely giving examples to backing it up. Since you didn´t answer any questions, this seems very fishy.

F.5 – Do not go against a forum moderator’s warning or decision, for example by re-posting deleted content, re-creating locked threads, or ignoring a warning issued in the thread.

[...] Just shows to me how little you know from the get go already. Changing 50%+ of a roster is changing a roster a little? We are looking at replacing teams once they are playing an official with more than half their active roster consisting of new players. A new player being a player who joined after the start of the season. [...] Makes sense, because our goal as admins is obviously to kick as many teams out as we can. [...] People requesting admins in almost all cases are very happy with the answers or the support they received, what are you even basing your argumentation on? The only few times when players are not happy, is when a decision is made against them. Sometimes they understand after you explain it for them, sometimes they still think they are being treated unfairly or whatever, thats the only case when players might not be satisfied really. And that happens fairly rarely. I talked to you over an hour yesterday already, something I dont have to do, especially if you dont cannot or dont want to understand the reasons behind the decision that was seemingly made against your team. But I still explained it to you and disapproved your argumentation over and over again. But you just kept playing the same record like a broken record player, so at some point I will end the chat, when I feel that my time and effort are wasted and can be spend in a better way. [...] How do you even know that? [...] As stated above, we are looking into possible hijack cases once you play an official with 50%+ new players, which is more than 4 or in other words 5, as ash said in a different thread. He never said 4, he said more than 4. [...] Because we cannot possibly babysit and monitor every team. The rules are openly available for everyone for a reason. Teams want to change their roster, they come to us in advance. How would we even know if a team plans to change their roster? Once they changed their roster and played the official with 50%+ new players its too late already. Generally this rule exists and is enforced to ensure that a team playing against a certain team at the start of the season, has the same chances for the sake of fairness compared to another team playing the same team at the end of the season. If a team replaces over half of their active players mid season, it can be unfair to the teams they played earlier in the season (if they are replacing better players with worse) or unfair to the teams they are playing later in the season (if they are replacing worse players with better ones). As the rule also states, the whole situation can be avoided by contacting an admin and informing him that you will need to replace players or get new players in and by presenting these players. The admins will then evaluate if the request is reasonable, which happens fairly quickly and you can continue from there if everything's fine. Teams not even bothering to contact an admin, let alone read the rules, shouldnt really except any leeway from the admins. Since every team is treated the same, based on the same rules. [...] Have fun with that. :)

So it's first time it being used. It was never used before, I know players are not banned. Can you just see I am trying to get to the agreement. I really sorry if you felt offended Sonny but I really aim to do good here. So can we discuss peacefully.