Wouldnt it be a better system to adapt the football system entirely? (...) This way, we can also skip the first week of playoffs, where normally only teams equal on points play to decide their div rank, making that one game in that one week count for their entire season, instead of making every game they played in the entire season count in that scoring, which this RR system will do.

[...] ayeaye is nice I suppose its rather impossible to pass my idea off as reasonable as the majority prefer the a win is a win, a loss is a loss approach

[...] This is surely an interesting statistic. It's a bit different from what the OP suggested as it doesn't affect points, so it would mainly be usefull for tiebreakers or as a nice statistic.

Wouldnt it be a better system to adapt the football system entirely? A loss is a loss, so points remain points, but give every team a overall RoundRatio for the season... +1 on the ratio for every cap won. -1 on the ratio for every cap lost. Making the RR the distinction between teams that are equal on points. So losing a game 5-4 5-4 will still give you 0 points, but will only affect your RR with -2, instead of -10 if you lost it 5-0 5-0. That way, points would still be the deciding factor of the div rank, but if teams are equal on points, the RR will decide who takes the top spot. Prem example Example of random div with about 50% of total matches played This way, we can also skip the first week of playoffs, where normally only teams equal on points play to decide their div rank, making that one game in that one week count for their entire season, instead of making every game they played in the entire season count in that scoring, which this RR system will do.

Wouldnt it be a better system to adapt the football system entirely? A loss is a loss, so points remain points, but give every team a overall RoundRatio for the season... +1 on the ratio for every cap won. -1 on the ratio for every cap lost. Making the RR the distinction between teams that are equal on points. So losing a game 5-4 5-4 will still give you 0 points, but will only affect your RR with -2, instead of -10 if you lost it 5-0 5-0. That way, points would still be the deciding factor of the div rank, but if teams are equal on points, the RR will decide who takes the top spot. Prem example Example of random div with about 50% of total matches played This way, we can also skip the first week of playoffs, where normally only teams equal on points play to decide their div rank, making that one game in that one week count for their entire season, instead of making every game they played in the entire season count in that scoring, which this RR system will do.

[...] Yep. Simplicity is a wonderful thing.

This whole thread is exactly the reason we should leave it how it is.

[...] Ignore the fact they were dropped - for a good comparisson you need to calc the 'normal' points as well though.

[...] no pcws tonight so ill get busy on them even though it seems pointless as people are against this, 99% at least how in the world am i supposed to calculate results with dropped teams though ><?

[...] Ending 2nd in a league/cup is related to the score of one particular game how? Also how are those tables doing?

[...] ? by that logic; Final of the football world cup, 2nd place team lost but still got lots of emone, so is that a childs sport for you =p?

Losing is still losing, be it with 5-0 or 5-4.. Otherwise it's like playing sports for children: Ah you lost but you still get a something, a 'special' prize. Point being, teams themselves should make proper judgements of their games, if you lose 5-4 due to bad communication and got backcapped, thats meant as a learning moment, whereas with the proposed new rules most would just think ahh well we still got some points.