<?xml version="1.0" ?><rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
	<title>ETF2L &#8211; Latest activity in &#8220;Max Frames config reducing fps&#8221;</title>
	<link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/customise/topic-28144/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[The latest posts to this topic.]]></description>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by rviens</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/customise/topic-28144/page-1/?recent=487282#post=487282</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from Popcorp</i>
		<blockquote>Sometimes Graphics card can't support Low textures, it puts too much pressure on them to Lower textures to Minecraft level, so a graphics card that was made for High textures will give more fps if using High graphics.

That's what i heard at least in some forum long time ago, but i can't say it's true or not</blockquote>
:-)]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=customise&#038;topic=28144&#038;post=487282</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 22:26:32 +0100</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Solid Speerlaiye</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/customise/topic-28144/page-1/?recent=487282#post=487280</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from Bucake</i>
		<blockquote>seems outdated, though :&#60; (for example it has -heapsize in it, which isn&#039;t used anymore.)</blockquote>
It is really outdated but that doesn't stop it from giving me better fps than chris' updated version]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=customise&#038;topic=28144&#038;post=487280</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 22:18:27 +0100</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Bucake</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/customise/topic-28144/page-1/?recent=487282#post=487279</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[thanks Solid/Cuttlefish.

seems outdated, though :&#60; (for example it has -heapsize in it, which isn&#039;t used anymore.)]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=customise&#038;topic=28144&#038;post=487279</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 22:17:12 +0100</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Cuttlefish</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/customise/topic-28144/page-1/?recent=487282#post=487278</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from Bucake</i>
		<blockquote>[...]

i'm just curious :j

can anyone here confirm if <a href="http://www.m0re.fi/autoexec_high.7z">this</a> is the most recent version? is it even the right one?</blockquote>

I got the one I use here -  http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/437678-team-fortress-2/53044464]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=customise&#038;topic=28144&#038;post=487278</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 22:08:03 +0100</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Bucake</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/customise/topic-28144/page-1/?recent=487282#post=487277</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from Cuttlefish</i>
		<blockquote>[...]

Can't explain it, but it works. Try it if you're sceptical.</blockquote>

i'm just curious :j

can anyone here confirm if <a href="http://www.m0re.fi/autoexec_high.7z">this</a> is the most recent version? is it even the right one?]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=customise&#038;topic=28144&#038;post=487277</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 22:05:02 +0100</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Cuttlefish</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/customise/topic-28144/page-1/?recent=487282#post=487276</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from Solid</i>
		<blockquote>[...]

I tested it a while back an m0re's highframes gave me about 10fps more than chris' highframes. Doesn't really matter for me as I get enough fps already but it could be interesting to someone who gets low fps.

http://pastebin.com/UCw52769</blockquote>

The difference is much more striking if your FPS was shit before. :p]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=customise&#038;topic=28144&#038;post=487276</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 22:03:45 +0100</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Solid Speerlaiye</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/customise/topic-28144/page-1/?recent=487282#post=487275</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from Bucake</i>
		<blockquote>really? any idea what exactly the difference is? because i can't really imagine they're that different..</blockquote>

I tested it a while back an m0re's highframes gave me about 10fps more than chris' highframes. Doesn't really matter for me as I get enough fps already but it could be interesting to someone who gets low fps.

http://pastebin.com/UCw52769]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=customise&#038;topic=28144&#038;post=487275</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 22:02:59 +0100</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Cuttlefish</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/customise/topic-28144/page-1/?recent=487282#post=487274</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from Bucake</i>
		<blockquote>[...]

really? any idea what exactly the difference is? because i can't really imagine they're that different..</blockquote>

Can't explain it, but it works. Try it if you're sceptical.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=customise&#038;topic=28144&#038;post=487274</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 21:59:09 +0100</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Bucake</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/customise/topic-28144/page-1/?recent=487282#post=487273</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[<i>Quoted from Cuttlefish</i>
		<blockquote>Maxframes isn't that good for fps anyway compared to m0re highfps.</blockquote>

really? any idea what exactly the difference is? because i can't really imagine they're that different..]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=customise&#038;topic=28144&#038;post=487273</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 21:56:02 +0100</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by Cuttlefish</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/customise/topic-28144/page-1/?recent=487282#post=487265</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[Maxframes isn't that good for fps anyway compared to m0re highfps.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=customise&#038;topic=28144&#038;post=487265</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 20:05:15 +0100</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by funkysash</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/customise/topic-28144/page-1/?recent=487282#post=487264</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[Maxframes is dx8 and everything else is DirectX 9. The graphics pipeline has change a lot since then and DirectX 8 doesn't seem to be supported that well anymore. Additionally dx9 seems to be better optimized in the source engine.]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=customise&#038;topic=28144&#038;post=487264</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 20:01:34 +0100</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Reply by popcorp</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/customise/topic-28144/page-1/?recent=487282#post=487262</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[Sometimes Graphics card can't support Low textures, it puts too much pressure on them to Lower textures to Minecraft level, so a graphics card that was made for High textures will give more fps if using High graphics.

That's what i heard at least in some forum long time ago, but i can't say it's true or not]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=customise&#038;topic=28144&#038;post=487262</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 19:54:10 +0100</pubDate>
    	</item>
    	<item>
    	    <title>Created by Xacher</title>
    	    <link>https://staging.etf2l.org/forum/customise/topic-28144/page-1/?recent=487282#post=487256</link>
    	    <description><![CDATA[So i found a link on teamfortress.tv to a 2011! article
http://www.toptiertactics.com/5965/team-fortress-2-optimization-and-insanity/
Basically the author tells us that he gets more fps with the Chris Maxquality config, and less with the maxframes one.
Any thoughts on this?]]></description>
    	    <guid isPermaLink="false">generator=rsdiscuss&#038;baseurl=https://staging.etf2l.org&#038;feed=forum&#038;forum=customise&#038;topic=28144&#038;post=487256</guid>
    	    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 19:04:32 +0100</pubDate>
    	</item>
    </channel>
</rss>